Blue Ribbon for the Indispensable Ocean

GPO Blue Ribbon Panel of Ocean Experts - CEOs to activists

Today, a unique panel of business, government, conservation and academic leaders convened by the Global Partnership for the Oceans (GPO) has agreed on a global strategy for aligning ocean health and human well‐being. USAID is a founding donor partner in the 140+ member Global Partnership for Oceans – a partnership committed to working together to solve the critical issues affecting the health of our oceans. 

The Blue Ribbon Panel, which includes 21 global experts from 16 countries, emphasizes that without action to turn around the declining health of the ocean, the consequences for economies, communities and ecosystems will be irreversible. But there is good news: solutions exist that benefit both oceans and economies, according to the Blue Ribbon Panel’s report, Indispensable Ocean.

According to the panel, fragmented approaches that fail to consider social, political, economic and ecological relationships will fail to meet the complex challenges facing ocean health. The report calls for an integrated approach to ocean investment and emphasizes the essential role of public‐ private partnerships.

The panel agreed that the Global Partnership for Oceans is a platform that brings together the multi‐stakeholder support, technical expertise and finance needed to change the course on oceans.

The panel did not identify a “silver bullet” to resolving urgent ocean challenges. Instead, it proposes five principles to ensure effective GPO investments: (1) sustainable livelihoods, social equity and food security; (2) a healthy ocean; (3) effective governance systems; (4) long‐term viability and (5) capacity building and innovation.

A rocky start

I'm not sure where September went, but I find myself in a new office in New Brunswick over looking trees donning the multi-hues of fall... as an new Assistant Professor at Rutgers's Institute of Marine and Coastal Science.

Have I finally settled? This is the illusive tenure-track faculty position - achieved! Like a barnacle cyprid, I'm testing out furniture arrangements before cementing it in place. I'm overwhelmingly excited and also overwhelmed - with the stuff to purchase, with living in a hotel and then finally moving (our sewer main was discovered broken less than 48 hours after closing!), with bringing personnel on board, and well, the whole thing. Hopefully, my rocky start will lead to a better over all hold as well. Right now, I feel woefully behind.

A new website is in the works. I hope to share it shortly!

Farewell to DC

My USAID farewell was hastened and my farewell party postponed due to the 50th anniversary on the March on Washington (for freedom and jobs). Admittedly, that was a bigger and better party celebrating a more important event, but a bummer nevertheless.

NY Daily News - Flooding in Manila Aug 2013

Instead, my FAB (Forestry and Biodiversity) Office farewell was rescheduled on what ended up being my first day back with them as a short term consultant. We had a little after hours celebration with drinks and snacks (outside the office of course). I was extremely surprised that I got a farewell present - a gift card to REI. The funds were for a specific item - waders. Every TDY I went on had a major flood - Jakarta, Manila. Just as this was being explained, the skies opened up and it started pouring down rain in DC!! The covered patio... started to flood. Perfect.

Typhoon Utor

My second trip for USAID, my first trip to the Philippines... and my first typhoon, Super Typhoon Utor.

 

Yep that's Utor in all of its Cat 4 glory... and I'm in that dot labelled Manila. 

As impressive as Utor was from space, the punch on the ground wasn't nearly as impressive. There was a good wind whistling through my sliding glass door and a couple of downpours, but I didn't see even a single tree fall down. Manila was lucky - Utor stayed to the north part of the island. Communities there were not so lucky - and this coming after numerous other storms.

I've heard estimates from 11-25 named storms each year hit the Philippines. Not all of them become typhoon strength, and of those not all become super typhoons. [For those of us in DC, we know that names don't always mean that much - the derecho June of 2012 was far worse than Hurricane Sandy.]

People here are already murmuring about climate change -- Mindanao didn't usually have typhoons. Now the paths are pushing more to the south. The typhoon season is shifting from June to November to August to December. 

Climate change adaptation - sea level rise, ocean acidification, disaster risk reduction - are concerns of this well informed and vocal people. I am very impressed by the ability of the Filipino society and even parts of the government. Its easy to be in Manila and forget that this is a developing country. Similar to Indonesia, the rapidly growing economy is sky rocketing some while leaving many more in extreme poverty and susceptible to shocks, like Utor. Clearly, there is still work to be done, but there's a great base and people to make the work succeed.

Measuring publishing impact

Article specific metrics.
The newest and first female editor in chief for Science magazine provided her insights on Scientific publishing to the current AAAS fellows.  One of the suggestions was article specific metrics. PLoS has embraced article metrics - how many views, how many downloads, etc.  In many ways, this is great! I love more data! The articles stand for themselves. Unfortunately, it's not quite that easy from where I'm sitting.

At the end of the day the journal still matters and early career scientists may be at a huge disadvantage.
Part of a journal's impact is its reach and readership. Some journals are more likely to read than another. Sure, with online search capabilities this has lessened. You can search and find articles in thousands of journals that wouldn't have been found back in the dark ages in the stacks. However, I still get Science and pursue the magazine. I also subscribe to get an email blast with the newest table of contents for my favorite journals. I know and trust these journals. I know their review process is robust... having been slammed by it before. The journal still matters.

So to the individual article metrics... Obviously the best journals will have higher metrics. Many of these journals, including Science, get press coverage that helps to push statistics. Different sectors have different audiences... With different sizes and citation rates. Take the large and fast paced biomedical sciences compared to geology. As an early career scientist, my completely heliocentric view is that article metrics open the system to more popularity contests and potentially work against new people breaking in.

Where will this go? Can we find a middle ground?  Metrics that combine both the journals reputation and a sector adjusted article metric...
Which metrics do you prefer?

Off the coast

Back to basics... well at least my basics - The Deep Sea.

I know its been a while since I posted something on the deep sea. USAID and the international development world has been rather consuming. The deep sea rarely comes up in that context - though I did have a meeting with Marine Conservation Science Institute a couple of weeks ago. A smile swam across my face when I saw the East Pacific Rise as one of their 'Jewels'.

To the point... there's been a new discovery. I know... this happens all the time in the deep sea, but its a great reminder that we don't even know what's in our backyard.

A new seep was imaged and sampled in Baltimore Canyon earlier this month. Mussels extended as far as they could see -- admittedly from a submarine or ROV camera the field of view is limited by light. They even found sea urchins and sea cucumbers - yeah for echinoderms.

A lithodid crab seen on the mussel bed at 1,600 meters. Image courtesy of Deepwater Canyons 2013 - Pathways to the Abyss, NOAA-OER/BOEM/USGS

These oases of animals are found where methane, hydrogen sulfide or hydrocarbons seep out of the seafloor. The chemicals originate from deposits of ancient sea life... which in turns supports a new communities.

Few cold seeps are known along the eastern coast. The East Coast represents a dispersal challenge -- the larvae of many seep mussels are thought to spend time near the surface where the Gulf Stream could whisk them away. The usual dispersal/connectivities apply -- where do they come from and where do they go?

http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/13midatlantic/logs/may8/may8.html

SESYNC

Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center SESYNC

Where humans and environments intersect...

(c) David Lazar

And what a fun meeting place. SESYNC is the closest I'll get to a 'Google' work environment.  Breaks with cookies and soccer - perfect.  Better yet, in between the breaks, I got to work with amazing people on how a healthy marine environment and improved marine governance (aka Marine Protected Areas - MPAs) affect human health on national and a global scale.

This is what happens when big data from usually disconnected sources come together for a mash up. You get a bunch of nerds 'geeking out' in front of white boards.  Ah... white boards full of ideas, mechanisms, and data sources!!  So satisfying. 

If you'd like to learn more about our project, go to:
http://www.sesync.org/evaluating-relationships

Evolving Conservation

(c) National Geographic

When I grew up 'conservation' meant (to me) saving the pandas or tigers or elephants. Oh my. Charismatic megafauna - the cute, squishy, and cuddly animals that you can put on posters. Conservation was about species.

Conservation has evolved. I don't know whether the NGOs (... I guess not everyone knows D.C. speak... it means non-profits) realized that people cared more about people than animals, that their efforts were wiped clean in a few years if they didn't address help the humans whose activity threatened the animals (and whole ecosystems), or if it was just a new way to get money... or something else completely. No matter what the driving force, the result is conservation as a more holistic set of activities that, I would argue, is more effective.

I have a new view and appreciation for conservation non-profits and the work they do. 

The other side of Indonesia

The big city side... The fishing coasts... The rice bowl. The terraced rice paddies. The stereotypical hats, and not so stereotypical hats.

They are all the unique, kind, and beautiful people of Indonesia. 

 

 

 

 

Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated

I got a rude awakening to my blissful ignorance about fishing practices around the world. I like to think about beautiful, picturesque fishing villages like this:

 

...where traditional artisanal fishing is still done and in a sustainable way.

While those are pictures I took during this trip and artisanal fishing is still done, much of it is not sustainable even without industrialization of the fleet. People are poor. They need to feed their families. Anything that they can get out of the sea to sell or eat is fair game. This is not to say that people are breaking the law. Some probably are, but in general, fishery regulations are lax and what few exist are often poorly enforced. 'New' species are being collected... "Baby Shark" and "Baby Tuna". The fish landings at these picturesque scenes also look like this:

"Baby shark." For scale the tiles are standard 12" x 12"

"Baby Tuna." Yellow fin and Skipjacks being weighed and sold. Yes the fish on the floor are tuna.